49464 49464
  • 01-02-2021
  • Mathematics
contestada

help plz will give brainlyest

help plz will give brainlyest class=

Respuesta :

akposevictor
akposevictor akposevictor
  • 07-02-2021

Answer:

A. Cendric is correct because he used the inverse of subtraction and added 4.5

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for x, all we needed to do was to make x stand alone. To do this, we have to apply addition property of equality. This means we would add 4.5 to both sides for the equation to balance. Thus, we would have z standing alone which equals 3.

Therefore, Cendric was correct because he used the inverse of subtraction of -4.5, which is 4.5 that was later added to both sides of the equation.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

What is an inferred claim?
What was the result of collisions between the early Earth and other, smaller protoplanets? A. Matter within the protoplanets was absorbed and became the Ear
What is the e-file rejection error for an Invalid bank account or routing transit numbers?
Why does Paine think a monarch is poorly suited to rule?
An atom of copper is represented by 6529cu. how many neutrons are in the nucleus of this atom?
7. What was the main goal of labor unions by the end of the 19th century?
What is the main digestive function of the pancreas?
What does sfb allowed mean in real estate?
Select all that apply. (xyz)2 = _____ The expression without exponents is?
A statement Sn about the positive integers is given. Write statements Sk and Sk+1, simplifying Sk+1 completely. Show your work. Sn: 1 ∙ 2 + 2 ∙ 3 + 3 ∙ 4 + . .